An Unadulterated Life

I often wonder what it would be like to purge the unessential from my life. Run without my Garmin. Delete Instagram and cancel my digital NY Times subscription. Trade in my iPhone for a circa-2003 flip phone. Sell my PS5 and abstain from video games forever. Find a way to block YouTube. It’s not that any of these things are inherently bad or without value. They’re just so addictive and unrewarding (the natural analogy being a bag of chips) that I repeatedly find myself cheated out of time (nutrients) better spent elsewhere (remorse from eating entire bag in one sitting).

What would a life free of excessive distraction look like? Would I gladly read for hours on end as I was compelled to in college? Would my writing practice gain the focus I so desperately desire? Would I spend more time and be more present with my family? I’ve been obsessed with the idea that if I could get rid of the superfluous distractions in my life, I would be more intentional and focused in what I chose to do, creating, in turn, more meaning in my life. The needle measuring my existence would be pulled away from the passive toward a more active, purposeful way of living. 

I think about this every day, throughout each day, without end. I imagine myself (literally and figuratively) throwing all this stuff out and regaining that wonderful freedom enabled by deficiency. 

It’s fair to say there’s much more distraction now than there used to be. Of course, we’ve always found ways to amuse ourselves—TV, radio, supermarket paperbacks, tabloids, drugs, gossip, daydreaming, pretty much any hobby or fleeting interest—but smartphones have altered the paradigm of how we live. Distraction follows us around demanding our attention. I unconsciously glance over at my phone when it’s out. My phone has become an essential utensil when I’m eating breakfast. My thumbs open Instagram moments after closing it. Operating my iPhone is as instinctive as blinking. One look around at all the people slumped over their phones driving distracted, walking blind down the sidewalk, ignoring each other on the train, and filling every bit of free time they have testifies that I’m not alone. 

So why can’t I disentangle myself from these devices and services I supposedly hate? That’s the question I keep asking myself.

When it comes to my phone, part of the problem, to an ever-increasing degree, is that not having a smartphone would make day-to-day life much harder. Restaurants use QR codes for menus and ordering. My train pass is on my phone. International calling and texting is free and simple with a smartphone. Music and podcasts and audiobooks pretty much require a smartphone. It’s nice to have a camera with me at all times. It’s an ever-expanding list. 

I like knowing how far and fast I’ve run with my Garmin. Instagram is great for keeping up with local businesses and faraway friends. I consistently find articles that excite and challenge the way I think on NY Times. Video games are just plain fun. These are all good things. I just wish I didn’t have to let in the negative with the positive. 

I’m searching for a catalyst. Something that will drive me over the edge and push me to give it all up. I’ve come close with seeing the way screen time makes my kids antsy and quick to anger. I fantasize of snapping their iPad in half when they whine for the dozenth time that they want to watch. It’s almost enough to give it all up. Almost. 

Would anyone even notice if I took such drastic steps? Certainly no one on Instagram would, just as I don’t notice when other people quit posting (or Meta’s algorithm ceases showing me their posts). No one will care if I watch YouTube or play video games or read the news. I can speak from experience in saying that absolutely no one cares how far I ran last Saturday. No one cares if I read or write more, either, but at least these pursuits will, I hope, make me a better person. I certainly feel better about myself when I devote attention to them.

So much of the unessential exists solely to siphon off as much of our attention as possible. Our time is mined for profit through ad revenue and personal data that can be sold to further refine impenetrable algorithms. These companies only goal, recognizing that they’re in a zero sum contest for our attention, is to make us as addicted, dependent, and distracted as possible. Every moment we’re not using their platforms is nothing more than growth potential on a graph. There’s nothing radical about these statements. 

Perhaps I’m naive to believe that life without all this distraction that fills up the vast majority of my free time would be better. Nostalgia, including my longing for a return to life before smartphones and social media, is inherently unreliable. I recently read (…on NY Times) that nostalgia was originally a medical term for homesickness, and I can speak from experience that the homesick person doesn’t think straight. But I also recognize that I’m faced with a choice to let my smartphone and social media control me or give it all up and decide for myself how I want to use my time. There is no happy in-between, at least not for me. It’s all too addictive to ever have a healthy, balanced relationship with it. I need to go cold turkey, I need to try out life without it, I need to find a way to take that first step. I just don’t know how.

ChatGPT and The Future of Writing

As a writer, am I worried about this new generation of A.I. capable of human-like language at inhuman speed and efficiency? Yes. Though not because I think it will ever write better than human writers. ChatGPT’s moral void, its fundamental inability to understand the human condition, shackles its meaning-making capabilities. Devoid of the shared humanity between author and reader, A.I., at best, can create only crude imitations of what’s already been written in aggregate. 

What actually worries me is that A.I. writing will become so ubiquitous that all writing produced from here on will need be met with wary skepticism, if not outright distrust. Just as Instagram robbed us of our faith in photography as an accurate reflection of reality, perverting our collective sense of beauty through repeated exposure to images of ersatz perfection, the power of A.I. to write so much with such ease may, in time, become irresistible to all but a few stalwart luddites akin to film photographers and vinyl aficionados. And, just as the glut of information made available by the internet led us to prioritize skimming over focused, deep reading (leading, perhaps, to the rise in popularity of Y.A. and short fiction, and even steeper rise in not reading books at all), A.I. writing may become so polished, fed by an ever-expanding trove of data and algorithmic understanding of user engagement, that authentic human writing could come to feel sloppy and unfocused (as humans themselves are). If/when we reach that point, how much longer will it be before we’re unwilling to (or incapable of) deciphering the literature of our own human past without assistance from an A.I.? 

Is the master who uses a tool that subverts its master really a master at all?

I'm starting a blog because…

I started my first blog 15 years ago, posting to it for five years before taking it down. Back then a blog was a sort of long-form tweet, a wordy Instagram post. I had just moved to Hawaii and wanted to share my sliver of life with family and friends (and whoever else might be interested). A blog was a journal of the quotidian—one’s personal, but not too personal, life. Thinking about it now, I must have taken it down around the time I started using Instagram. Social media companies reduced the friction of sharing (and over-sharing) personal details with the world.

So why blog in 2022? I’ve been writing seriously for years and earned an MFA in Creative Writing a few months ago. I write with the hope that someone will publish my work, help deliver it into the world, not that I’ll put it out there (for free) myself. Blogging is so antithetical to my idea of writing that it hadn’t crossed my mind in years. But I now realize, after having a cohort of writers to read my work the past three years, I want people to see my work. I love to write and I write for myself first, but I also like knowing that someone beside the polite person who sends out New Yorker rejection notices is reading my writing. 

I want a small grove in the woods where I can plant my creations and be content with the hope that whoever stumbles upon them will find a slight, but not inconsequential, pleasure in what I’ve made.

I envision The Everyday Essayist as a repository of thoughts. A place where I can warm up my fingers and mind, try out different ideas (as the French root of essay—essayer: to try—suggests) before developing them further into the writing projects I spend most of my time on. There will be no novel excerpts, no short stories or essays I hope to submit for publication, but perhaps some flash fiction, thoughts on life where I’m at (currently northern Japan), and random ideas on whatever is sticking in my mind. 

More to come soon.